Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > Gladiator's Arena

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 04, 2005, 06:05 AM // 06:05   #1
Ascalonian Squire
 
spacemonkeymafia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default rangers suck, right????

today i was with my new E/Me in the silverpike arena for about one hour the first group i got was me a Mo/R a E/Mo and a W/Mo and we lost bad i got one kill and that was all so i got a second group and it was me (E/Me) and 3 R/Mo and we owned the rest of the people for that hour

so the answer i think is no rangers are awesome i have one of my own and i like he alot i know it was just silverpike but we really beat everyone else into the ground with a bat so you people that sayin rangers are not very good are very very wrong
spacemonkeymafia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 06:09 AM // 06:09   #2
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

It's nice that you won with a group of mostly rangers but this doesn't really say anything regarding how good a class is. Not that I'm asking for any (objective analysis of the ranger has been done extensively) but ya know, it's not really proof...
Keure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 06:18 AM // 06:18   #3
Jungle Guide
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Jersey
Guild: Idiot Savants
Default

Umm... what the hell is the point of this thread exactly?
Eonwe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 06:41 AM // 06:41   #4
Desert Nomad
 
Ristaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canada, eh?
Guild: Legion Of Valhalla
Profession: E/
Default

Another person has realized that rangers do not suck, contradicting numerous shortsighted idiots that often come here and claim the class is useless.
*gives spacemonkeymafia a cookie*
Ristaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 07:21 AM // 07:21   #5
Krytan Explorer
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: America
Guild: The Kansas City Hotsteppers [KCHS]
Profession: R/
Default

There are good rangers and bad rangers.
Tellani Artini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 07:57 AM // 07:57   #6
Wilds Pathfinder
 
TwinRaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: W/
Default

I challenge any other group to run through the Underworld, hunting smites and coldfire nights in a group of only four...trappers rule through there...not proof of ranger superiority, just a nice area for us to play...
TwinRaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 08:10 AM // 08:10   #7
Banned
 
Algren Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Default

take this for what it's worth....absolutely nothing

I've found that 90 percent of the people that play this game have no idea what they are doing...whether it's because they are generally awful at video games...or because they've been rushed through the entire thing I don't know. But most people have absolutely no idea how to play there class. That said, Ranger is a VERY difficult class to play effectively. They don't get great armor...they don't do great damage....their skills don't allow them to do much damage...and they don't get alot of mana. BUT the ranger can change the battle field...it's the only class in the game that can do EVERYTHING effectively...The ranger is PERFECT for calling targets and leading a group. When played correctly the ranger can be VERY effective. Trap & Pull......it's your best friend.

in short...EVERY class is super effective if played correctly...some easier than others, but all of the classes in this game are pretty balanced it just takes the right frame of mind and the desire to lead to play the ranger effectively.
Algren Cole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 08:13 AM // 08:13   #8
Site Contributor
 
Principa Discordia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England.
Default

I love ranger, personally.
Principa Discordia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 08:20 AM // 08:20   #9
Forge Runner
 
PieXags's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Infinite Representation Of Pie And Its Many Brilliances
Default

My first character ever was a ranger.

I quit him 'cause I thought he sucked.

When I partied with rangers...they all sucked.

Then I saw a video on some forums of a ranger.

And then I made another ranger.

And now I love my ranger.

I'm definately going to have to agree, 90% of the rangers I've ever met were useless to me. Hell I know if my first character would've continued to be a ranger I would've sucked. But I went and researched the skills, looked into some builds. Went with some pick and choose and improvision and...BAM. I love my ranger. Today, most every group I joined in the arenas (small-end I know, but our group of 1 monk 2 rangers and an elementalist took out 10 groups in the normal arena, several of them having at least 2, even 3 monks with them...and then we won about 4 battles in the team arenas. With me and the other ranger as the main damage dealers.)

In the tombs, since I'm not often the target, I can typically take down a couple of the bad guys alone while the rest of my team concentrates elsewhere. And in GvG, a few good rangers can be be a great addition to have.

A ranger played properly most definately, does not suck.

Go rangers.
PieXags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 08:24 AM // 08:24   #10
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Algren Cole
take this for what it's worth....absolutely nothing

I've found that 90 percent of the people that play this game have no idea what they are doing...whether it's because they are generally awful at video games...or because they've been rushed through the entire thing I don't know. But most people have absolutely no idea how to play there class. That said, Ranger is a VERY difficult class to play effectively. They don't get great armor...they don't do great damage....their skills don't allow them to do much damage...and they don't get alot of mana. BUT the ranger can change the battle field...it's the only class in the game that can do EVERYTHING effectively...The ranger is PERFECT for calling targets and leading a group. When played correctly the ranger can be VERY effective. Trap & Pull......it's your best friend.

in short...EVERY class is super effective if played correctly...some easier than others, but all of the classes in this game are pretty balanced it just takes the right frame of mind and the desire to lead to play the ranger effectively.
They dont get great armor? they get the second best armor in the game: 70AL +30AL vs elemental attacks

also with high expertise it will cut the energy cost for all ranger skills in half allowing them to do much more

and as for damage some skills allow them to do decent damage but mostly DOT damage (bleeding/posion).
Ragnarok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 11:33 AM // 11:33   #11
Banned
 
Algren Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragnarok
They dont get great armor? they get the second best armor in the game: 70AL +30AL vs elemental attacks

also with high expertise it will cut the energy cost for all ranger skills in half allowing them to do much more

and as for damage some skills allow them to do decent damage but mostly DOT damage (bleeding/posion).

they don't get the best armor....warriors do.

expertise is the best attribute in the game

and yes using the proper skills can allow a ranger to do a massive amount of damage..


but all of that goes into playing the ranger properly...it's not inherent.


played properly the ranger can be a very very big asset to any team/party
Algren Cole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 12:25 PM // 12:25   #12
Jungle Guide
 
arnansnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: DOOM
Profession: E/N
Default

Expertise is the best attribute in the game if you use skills.
arnansnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 12:31 PM // 12:31   #13
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

Ok this thread is pointless, the rangers have been discussed to death. Only people who have no real grasp of the game think rangers suck, they dont.
Prince Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 03:16 PM // 15:16   #14
Frost Gate Guardian
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: in the wild with Lion
Guild: Knights of the Old Republic
Profession: R/Mo
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Principa Discordia
I love ranger, personally.
Ditto. Ranger was my first character and my only character through all of beta. I call her my big guns, and regularly get requests for me to help out other people with her.

I did my homework to make her effective in PVP, and even beat one of the ascension quests with a group of 4 rangers!

I love my ranger.
thegriffgeeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 03:17 PM // 15:17   #15
Jungle Guide
 
arnansnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: DOOM
Profession: E/N
Default

Ranger was my first character as well, but I didn't really like it as I didn't like energy draining/blackout/trapping (I was a R/Me).
arnansnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 03:19 PM // 15:19   #16
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Frozen plains.
Guild: The Llanowar Legion [LL]
Profession: Me/N
Default

Really depends what kind of Ranger we talking.
I think the ones with interupting/condition builds are the most lethal..
especially vs Mesmers.
Rangers with lots of interrupts.. are what bug me the most!
Gerbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 03:20 PM // 15:20   #17
Jungle Guide
 
Edge Martinez's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NC
Guild: DKL
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Algren Cole
take this for what it's worth....absolutely nothing

I've found that 90 percent of the people that play this game have no idea what they are doing

That statement is worth quite a bit actually. This game is actually cool in that you constantly have to adjust your thinking. What worked against Charr won't necessarily work against Hydras or Mursaat. Refund points are awesome.

I think that by the time people hit Old Ascalon, 90% of them know exactly what to do. As the game progresses, however, it seems like they try and hold on to what was working then and lose sight of what can work now.
Edge Martinez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 03:29 PM // 15:29   #18
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Frozen plains.
Guild: The Llanowar Legion [LL]
Profession: Me/N
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edge Martinez
That statement is worth quite a bit actually. This game is actually cool in that you constantly have to adjust your thinking. What worked against Charr won't necessarily work against Hydras or Mursaat. Refund points are awesome.

I think that by the time people hit Old Ascalon, 90% of them know exactly what to do. As the game progresses, however, it seems like they try and hold on to what was working then and lose sight of what can work now.
Charr are easy.. really easy.. later on.. it just gets harder.. form let's say the Crystal Desert that's what often ticks people off, because they are like..
huh.. I am REALLY STRONG WHY DOESNT THIS WORK! they juz don't see... that they need to try a different approach.
Gerbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 03:50 PM // 15:50   #19
Desert Nomad
 
Neo-LD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Guild: [GSS][SoF][DIII]
Default

Like everyone in this thread, it seems, ranger was my first character. I really enjoy playing him, and am working on completely beating every aspect of pve ith him. (every mission, bonus, quest, slite skill, etc) I also arena and tombs with him frequently. To be honest, I have so many setups I could bring in terms of skills and strategy, I can fill bascially any role my guildmates need, and I can do it very well.

The reason why most rangers suck, in my opinion, is that in ascalon they find the glorious ignite arrows+dual shot and aree like "OMG hax!" but they never get past that to realize that their little +6 splash damage isnt helping in kryta. Rangers cannot compete with oter classes for damage without some of their late game skills, but noobs dont realize that immedeately.

Earlier someone was comparing tactics used against the charr, hydras, merssaat etc. Against the charr the high damage aprraoch works. Against hydras, rangers are best off bringing distracting and savage shot to keep their team alive by denying meteors. By the time you face the mersaat, you have barrage and tigers fury etc, so you can go back to damage, or start trapping, interupting, etc.
Neo-LD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 04, 2005, 05:08 PM // 17:08   #20
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Guild: Clan Plus [Plus]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ristaron
Another person has realized that rangers do not suck, contradicting numerous shortsighted idiots that often come here and claim the class is useless.
*gives spacemonkeymafia a cookie*

Rangers are only good when it comes to ranger combos.
Paine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
the REAL reason rangers suck inside!!! *RANT* Pillz_veritas The Riverside Inn 43 Oct 03, 2005 04:50 AM // 04:50
Do i suck? The undead Mesmer The Riverside Inn 17 Jul 14, 2005 10:10 PM // 22:10
Why does my dmg suck so much? free4all Questions & Answers 11 Jul 04, 2005 03:58 PM // 15:58
Do Rangers suck? ajeh The Campfire 4 May 18, 2005 07:03 AM // 07:03


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 AM // 03:50.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("